虎克的博客

Enthusiasm Biogeography-Biodiversity Informatics-Data Sciences

Visual Studio 2010快捷工具配置

| Comments

Visual Studio 2010+Code Rush + PowerCommand + Power Tools三種套件同時存在的微調修改

系列文章

demo 的 Visual Studio 一直以來都會安裝 Code Rush 和 PowerCommand ,一直也都合作愉快,但最近看了ScottGu’s 的 Power Tool 介紹文,看到了一個相當棒的功能 Solution Navigator 讓我決定也要安裝 Power Tools ,就因為這樣我的 Visual Studio 擁有了Code Rush + PowerCommand + Power Tools 三套套件,部份功能重複性還滿高的,所以就稍微作了一下調整,記錄下來以免以後忘記。

  • 最後更新:2011/7/6 上午 09:12:10

demo廢言先說明因為 demo 主要功能是 Code Rush > PowerCommand > Power Tools,因此有重複的功能會優先關掉 Power Tool 的,不過考量到 Code Rush 免費版到底有什麼功能我不知道,因此衝突的部份都會寫出來,有需要的朋友再自行調配使用。

Code Rush (官網)預設所有功能都是他,不調整


PowerCommand (官網)調整如下:

  1. 用到機率太小所以關閉。
  2. 內建就有了所以關閉。
  3. 和 Power Tools 重複,所以關閉。

Power Tools (官網)調整如下:

  1. 因不一定團隊成員都有安裝,所以意義不大,因此關閉。
  2. 與 Code Rush 衝突,因此關閉。
  3. 與 Code Rush 衝突,因此關閉。
  4. 因不一定團隊成員都有安裝,所以意義不大,因此關閉。
  5. 與 Code Rush 衝突,因此關閉。
  6. 單純因為自己用不到所以關閉…..
  7. 單純因為自己用不到所以關閉…..
  8. 單純因為自己用不到所以關閉…..
  9. CTRL﹢X 更好用所以關閉。

基於以上的調整後,一些重複的功能就不會出現了,但這三個套件功能繁雜,demo 不可能一一介紹(除非我開三篇文)所以就請各位參考一下官方和其他網友的說明吧。

分隔線

Visual Studio 擴充套件

原文地址:http://demo.tc/Post/630

Ubuntu使用Sed命令批量替换文件夹中文件内的字符串

| Comments

linux sed 批量替换多个文件中的字符串

1
sed -i "s/oldstring/newstring/g" \`grep oldstring -rl yourdir\`

例如:替换/resources下所有文件中的www.admin99.net为admin99.net

1
sed -i "s/www.admin99.net/admin99.net/g" \`grep www.admin99.net -rl /home\`

这个` 符号是F1下边,tab键上边,数字1左边的那个,不是单引号 ’

Ubuntu使用Sed命令批量替换文件夹中文件内的字符串

| Comments

linux sed 批量替换多个文件中的字符串
1
sed -i "s/oldstring/newstring/g" \`grep oldstring -rl yourdir\`

例如:替换/resources下所有文件中的www.admin99.net为admin99.net

1
2
sed -i "s/www.admin99.net/admin99.net/g" \`grep www.admin99.net -rl
/home\`

这个` 符号是F1下边,tab键上边,数字1左边的那个,不是单引号 ‘

   original link:
   <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io/blog/2011/12/04/ubuntue-config-02/'>http://Apiaceae.github.io/blog/2011/12/04/ubuntue-config-02/</a><br/>
   &nbsp;written by <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io'>Hooker</a>
   &nbsp;posted at <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io'>http://Apiaceae.github.io</a>
   </p>

我们还有多少分类学家?

| Comments

看看这些有意思的文章吧!

How many taxonomists are there?

Essential Reading.

There is only a limited number of papers and reports that give information on the status and development of the taxonomic capacities, especially the human capacities. Our working database with 350 contributions on taxonomy, DNA-Taxonomy, Barcoding and cases studies will soon be online. The data base include abstracts and links to online sources.

The whole issue 1444 of volume 359 of the “Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences” is devoted to taxonomy and its sattus and development.

Here is an alphabetic listing of what I found (see also the references there-in):

A

Alberch P (1993) Museums, Collections and Biodiversity Inventories. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8(10):372-375.

B

Bisby FA, Shimura J, Ruggiero M, Edwards J, Häuser C (2002) Taxonomy, at the click of a mouse. Nature 418:367.

Blackwelder RE & Blackwelder RM (1961) Directory of Zoological Taxonomists of the World. Southern Illionois University Press, Carbondale, Ill. (No ISBN no. available at that time but Library of Congress no. 61-15306 )

C

Cribb TH (2004) Living on the edge: parasite taxonomy in Australia. International Journal for Parasitology 34: (2)117-123.

D

Dickson D (1993) Britain funds taxonomy studies. Nature 362:383.

E

Edwards SR, David GM, Nerlin LI (1985) The Systematics Community. Association of Systematics Collections c/o Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045. Prepared for the NSF. ISBN 0-942924-12-6

G

Gaston KJ, May RM (1992) Taxonomy of taxonomists. Nature 356:281-283.

Gaston KJ, Mound LA (1993) Taxonomy, hypothesis testing and the biodiversity crisis. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society, London B 251:139-142. (see link top of page)

Gleich M, Maxeiner D, Miersch M, Nicolay F (2000) Life Counts. 287 pp. Berlin: Berlin Verlag

Golding SJ, Timberlake J (2003) How Taxonomists Can Bridge the Gap Between Taxonomy and Conservation Science. Conservation Biology 17(4):1177-1178.

Godfray HCJ (2002) How might more systematics be funded? Antenna 26(1):11-17.

Godfray HCJ, Knapp S (2004) Introduction. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359(1444):559-569. (see link top of page)

Green SV (1998) The taxonomic impediment in orthopteran research and conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 2(3-4):151 – 159.

Groombridge, B (ed) (1992) Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth’s Living Resources. A Report compiles by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre. xx, 585 pp.

H

Herbert DG, Smith GF, Hamer ML, Scholtz CH (2001) Taxonomy and systematics research in South Africa: vital reasearch facing a crisis in capacity and resources. Link …

Holden C (1989) Entomologists wane as insects wax. Science 246:754-756.

Hopkins GW, Freckleton RP (2002) Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. Animal Conservation 5(3):245-249.

House of Lords Report on taxonomy and systematic biology from 2001-2002: “What on Earth

J

Janzen DH (1993) Taxonomy: Universal and essential infrastructure for development and management of tropical wildlands biodiversity. Proceedings of the Norway/UNEP Expert Conference on Biodiversity, O.T. Sandlund and P. J. Schei (eds.), Trondheim, May, 1993. NINA, Trondheim. 100-113.

K

Klopper RR, Smith GF, Chikuni AC (2001) The Global Taxonomy Initiative: documenting the biodiversity of Africa. Strelitzia 12:xiii, 1-203.

Konsortium Systematics Agenda 2000 (1996) Agenda Systematik 2000. Kleine Senckenberg Reihe 21. 55 pp.

Kraus O (1976) Zoological Systematics in Central Europe (Zoologischer Systematik in Mitteleuropa). sonderbände des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg 1. Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg und Berlin. ISSN 0301-2697. ASTM-Coden: AVNHAV.

Krell FT (2000) Impact factors aren’t relevant to taxonomy. Nature 405:507-508.

M

May RM (1990) Taxonomy as destiny. Nature 347:129-130.

May RM (1990) How many species? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 330:293-304. (see link top of page)

Marioni L, Magalhães C & Marques AC (2005?) PROPOSTAS DE ESTRATÉGIAS E AÇÕES PARA A CONSOLIDAÇÃO DAS COLEÇÕES ZOOLÓGICAS BRASILEIRAS. (In Portugese, DOC download, 300 KB)

Marques AC & Lamas CJE (2005?) Sistemática zoológica no Brasil: estado da arte, expectativas e sugestões de ações futuras (48 pp, PDF download, 330 KB). In Portugese.

N

National Science Foundation NSF (2004) Workshop to Produce a Decadal Vision for Taxonomy and Natural History Collections. Link …

PRELIMINARY REPORT OF FIRST GLOBAL TAXONOMY INITIATIVE WORKSHOP IN ASIA. UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/9/INF/17. 12 September 2003.

S

Samper C (2004) Taxonomy and environmental policy. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359(1444):721–728. (see link top of page)

Schminke HK (1996) Naturkundliche Sammlungen – Das vernachlässigte Erbe? Spektrum der Wissenschaft 1996:116-119.

Schminke HK (1994) Wiederaufbau von Forschung und Lehre in der Zoosystematik – Eine nationale Aufgabe. Spektrum der Wissenschaft 1994(September):114-116.

Simonetti JA (1997) Biodiversity and a taxonomy of Chilean taxonomists. Biodiversity and Conservation 6(4):633 – 637.

Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND (2004) The Value of Museum Collections for Research and Society. BioScience 54(1):66-74.

Systematics Agenda 2000 (1994) Charting the Biosphere. Systematics Agenda 2000.

W

Wägele JW et al (200X) Methoden, Aufgaben und Leistungsfähigkeit der modernen Systematik. Kleine Senckenberg Reihe 36:40 pp.

What on Earth” the House of Lords Report on taxonomy and systematic biology from 2001-2002.

Williams J et al (2001) Biodiversity Theme Report. Australia State of the Environment Report 2001 (Theme Report). ISBN 0 643 06749 3; Link …

Winston JE, Metzger KL (1998) Trends in taxonomy revealed by the published literature. BioScience 48:344-346 or 125-128.

Z

Ziegler W et al (1997) Biodiversitätsforschung: Ihre Bedeutung für Wissenschaft, Anwendung und Ausbildung. Kleine Senckenberg Reihe 26:1-68.

 

来自:http://www.gti-kontaktstelle.de/taxonomy_Lit.html

尊敬的Frank Bisby教授

| Comments

image

英国里丁大学(University of Reading)植物系教授Frank Bisby与当地时间2011年10月25日晚去世。

Frank Bisby教授是目前在全球最有影响力的生物物种编目项目物种2000的项目发起和负责人,并且也是生物多样性信息标准-分类学数据库工作小组(Biodivesity Information Standards: TDWG)的第一届主席。也是最早发起世界豆科植物数据库ILDIS的创始人。是迄今仍然被后人使用的多个植物分类学信息标准的第一撰稿人。可以说Frank Bisby教授在植物多样性信息学领域是一个开拓者和奠基者。

和蔼、幽默、典型的英国绅士风格依然让人记忆犹新。

仅此纪念先辈的卓越工作!

2011年10月28日

Frank Bisby教授在科学杂志上的一篇文章,应该说开启了信息技术在植物学领域广泛应用的新起点。

image

Bisby, F.A., The Quiet Revolution: Biodiversity Informatics and the Internet. Science, 2000. 289(5488): p. 2309-2312.

当达尔文遇见Facebook:社会化的网络工具让自然博物学家们可以分享数据

| Comments

自然历史学家希望能够将地球上的生命多样性进行详细的刻画。然而,这门学科却遭遇大量研究信息和数据没有被充分利用的尴尬局面。英国大英自然历史博物馆的研究人员设计了出了一个叫“Scratchpads”的工具是科学家们可以相互分享他们的研究成果。

image

Scratchpads基于开源的内容管理Drupal基础上的二次开发。因此该系统除了具备Drupal本书的博客、合作编辑、论坛、网络社区、新闻通告、图片管理、数据上传和下载等基本的功能。大英自然历史博物馆的科学家在此基础上开发除了一些针对分类学家使用的模块,比如生物标本和文献,分类树数据的导入和导出,以及通过WebService技术是用户可以非常方便的使用Google Scholar, Biodiversity Heritage Library, flickr, NCBI Genbank, Morphbank等网站的相关信息.

原文地址:http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091110065917.htm

植物名录相关术语

| Comments

Native, Invasive, and Other Plant-Related Definitions

Native Plant

A plant that is a part of the balance of nature that has developed over hundreds or thousands of years in a particular region or ecosystem. Note: The word native should always be used with a geographic qualifier (that is, native to New England [for example]). Only plants found in this country before European settlement are considered to be native to the United States.

Invasive Plant

A plant that is both non-native and able to establish on many sites, grow quickly, and spread to the point of disrupting plant communities or ecosystems. Note: From the Presidential Executive Order 13112 (February 1999): ‘An invasive species is defined as a species that is 1) non-native (or alien) to the ecosystem under consideration and 2) whose introduction causes or is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health.’ In contrast to item 2) of the Executive Order, which includes plants invasive in agricultural settings, the Connecticut Invasive Plant Working Group lists non-native plants as invasive only if they invade minimally managed (natural) areas.

Non-Native Plant

A plant introduced with human help (intentionally or accidentally) to a new place or new type of habitat where it was not previously found. Note: Not all non-native plants are invasive. In fact, when many non-native plants are introduced to new places, they cannot reproduce or spread readily without continued human help (for example, many ornamental plants).