虎克的博客

Enthusiasm Biogeography-Biodiversity Informatics-Data Sciences

五个主要的电子分类学网站

| Comments

1、CATE http://www.cate-project.org/

The CATE (Creating a Taxonomic E-science) project, funded by the UK’s Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) under their e-science programme, be­gan in December 2005 and is a consortium of the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Natural History Museum London and the University of Oxford, Department of Zoology. CATE has its origins in a paper by Godfray (2002) which described the challenges facing taxonomy in the internet age, and suggested some avenues for innovation, including peer-reviewed consensus taxon­omies. The CATE project was set up to test the feasibility of these ideas using pilot studies on two families, one botanical (Araceae, the aroids: http:// www.cate-araceae.org) and one zoological (Sphingidae, the hawk moths: http://www.cate-sphingidae.org ). In each case the goal is to build a site covering about 1,300 species using existing literature and collections to extract taxonomic and nomenclatural information, descriptions and keys, type specimen images, other images, literature references and links. The design of the software is based on existing taxonomic information models such as Taxon Concept Schema (TCS, http://www.tdwg.org/activities/tnc/ tcs-schema-repository/), Structure of Descriptive Data (SDD, http://www.diversitycampus.net/Projects/ TDWG-SDD/index.html), Access to Biological Collec­tions Data (ABCD, http://www.bgbm.org/TDWG/ CODATA/Schema/) and the Common Data Model (CDM, http://wp5.e-taxonomy.eu/EDIT-Architecture. html). The aim is that the CATE software application will be generic, i.e. usable for other plant and animal groups. The CATE software architecture is database agnostic, i.e. it will work over a variety of different database formats and structures and the data is decoupled from on-screen delivery, which allows very ?exible presentation. The application is being built to facilitate integration with other frameworks such as GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility, http://www.gbif.org/) and Encyclopedia of Life (EoL, http://www.eol.org/) through the use of LSIDs (Life Science Identi?ers) which are unique electronic tags for taxon concepts. The target audience consists of two broad user types; taxonomists who both produce and need access to information, and non-taxonomists whose primary inter­est is to obtain access to information (although the system is open to anyone to make contributions). The management of the e-taxonomy website (the consensus taxonomy and any alternative hypotheses) can be divided into two main areas: content management, to be handled by the taxonomic community through an editorial body, and application management, which because of the costs of hosting and maintenance is probably only viable for appropriate major institutions such as natural history museums and herbaria. Any user can propose changes to the revision, and the decision whether to include them or not in the consensus classi?cation is made by review and modera­tion carried out by members of the interested commu­nity. Accepted proposals are incorporated into the next version of the consensus, but those that are rejected are nevertheless hosted on the site and visible as alternative hypotheses, attributed clearly to their authors. Contributions of non-moderated content are also an important component and already in the process of being implemented on the two taxon sites. This provides a way for people to contribute information, images or ideas that do not require community approval, but which are nevertheless of interest and will be credited to their authors. This type of content can potentially be incorporated into future versions of the consensus. We believe that the major innovation of CATE is its ambitious goal to provide software to implement a fully operational editing and peer-review system for proposals from the taxonomic community, making possible continuous update of consensus revisions. It focuses, more strongly than the other projects dis­cussed here, on consensus taxonomies, peer-review and the integration of the relevant taxonomic com­munity. The project also emphasises the provision of certain new features: illustrated interactive keys to all species and genera in the Araceae revision and a comprehensive set of standardised whole insect and genitalia images (the most critical morphological characters) in the case of the Sphingidae.

2.   Solanaceae Source (http://www.nhm.ac.uk/ solanaceaesource)

This major project, funded by the Planetary Biodiver­sity Inventory initiative of the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) as “PBI Solanum: a worldwide treatment”, has since 2004 been creating a new worldwide monograph of the large and economically important genus Solanum. The project is part of a much larger effort by the NSF to fund groups of taxonomists working on alpha-taxonomy and making it available electronically on the web — the PBI initiative began in 2002. PBI Solanum has brought together an international team of taxonomic special­ists of the family Solanaceae along with students and collaborators, and the website is currently managed at the Natural History Museum, London. Although existing moder

   original link:
   <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io/blog/2009/04/13/%E4%BA%94%E4%B8%AA%E4%B8%BB%E8%A6%81%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%AD%90%E5%88%86%E7%B1%BB%E5%AD%A6%E7%BD%91%E7%AB%99/'>http://Apiaceae.github.io/blog/2009/04/13/%E4%BA%94%E4%B8%AA%E4%B8%BB%E8%A6%81%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%AD%90%E5%88%86%E7%B1%BB%E5%AD%A6%E7%BD%91%E7%AB%99/</a><br/>
   &nbsp;written by <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io'>Hooker</a>
   &nbsp;posted at <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io'>http://Apiaceae.github.io</a>
   </p>

21世纪的分类学:现状和将来

| Comments

21世纪的分类学“Taxonomy for the twenty-first century

2004年9月,在英国皇家协会的Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences特别专刊上发表了一系列有关分类学研究现况和将来的综述文章。Allen Herre推荐这期的文章是极其有用的资源,它告诉我们什么是分类学以及他将来的发展趋势。 如下是这期专刊上文章的列表:

  • Introduction by H. C. J. Godfray and S. Knapp
  • Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny by Quentin D. Wheeler
  • A taxonomic wish-list for community ecology by Nicholas J. Gotelli
  • Protist taxonomy: an ecological perspective by Bland J. Finlay
  • Stability or stasis in the names of organisms: the evolving codes of nomenclature by Sandra Knapp, Gerardo Lamas, Eimear Nic Lughadha, et al.
  • Prokaryote diversity and taxonomy: current status and future challenges by Aharon Oren
  • Taxonomy and fossils: a critical appraisal by Peter L. Forey, Richard A. Fortey, Paul Kenrick, et al.
  • Automated species identification: why not? by Kevin J. Gaston and Mark A. O’Neill
  • The promise of a DNA taxonomy by Mark L. Blaxter
  • Towards a working list of all known plant species by Eimear Nic Lughadha
  • Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data by Jorge Soberón and Townsend Peterson
  • Unitary or unified taxonomy? by Malcolm J. Scoble
  • The role of taxonomy in species conservation by Georgina M. Mace
  • Taxonomy and environmental policy by Cristián Samper
  • Taxonomy: where are we now? by Peter H. Raven
  • Now is the time: by Daniel H. Janzen
  • Tomorrow’s taxonomy: collecting new species in the field will remain the rate-limiting step by Robert M. May
  • Documenting plant diversity: unfinished business by Peter R. Crane
  • Taxonomy as a fundamental discipline by Edward O. Wilson

2005年10月的专刊则专门刊登了有个DNA barkoce及其在分类学应用的问题:

  • “DNA barcoding of life” the 29 October 2005 issue of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences is devoted to papers presented at the First International Barcode Conference held at The Natural History Museum, London, 7-9 February 2005, a gathering that included 220 participants from 44 countries. By special arrangement with The Royal Society, this issue is available to members and visitors to the Consortium of the Barcode of Life site.
  • Towards writing the encyclopaedia of life: an introduction to DNA barcoding by Vincent Savolainen, Robyn S. Cowan, Alfried P. Vogler, et al.
  • DNA barcodes for biosecurity: invasive species identification by K.F. Armstrong and S.L. Ball
  • DNA barcoding for effective biodiversity assessment of a hyperdiverse arthropod group: the ants of Madagascar by M. Alex Smith, Brian L. Fisher, Paul D.N. Hebert
  • Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding by Daniel H. Janzen, Mehrdad Hajibabaei, John M. Burns, et al.
  • DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species by Robert D. Ward, Tyler S. Zemlak, Bronwyn H. Innes, et al.
  • Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: chances and challenges by Miguel Vences, Meike Thomas, Ronald M. Bonett, et al.
  • The problems and promise of DNA barcodes for species diagnosis of primate biomaterials by Joseph G. Lorenz, Whitney E. Jackson, Jeanne C. Beck, et al.
  • Applying DNA barcoding to red macroalgae: a preliminary appraisal holds promise for future applications by Gary W. Saunders
  • Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals by Mark W. Chase, Nicolas Salamin, Mike Wilkinson, et al.
  • Microcoding: the second step in DNA barcoding by R.C. Summerbell, C.A. Lévesque, K.A. Seifert, et al.
  • The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding by Rob DeSalle, Mary G. Egan, Mark Siddall
  • Reverse taxonomy: an approach towards determining the diversity of meiobenthic organisms based on ribosomal RNA signature sequences by Melanie Markmann and Diethard Tautz
  • DNA-based species delineation in tropical beetles using mitochondrial and nuclear markers by Michael T. Monaghan, Michael Balke, T. Ryan Gregory, et al.
  • Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data by Mark Blaxter, Jenna Mann, Tom Chapman, et al.
  • An integrated approach to fast and informative morphological vouchering of nematodes for applications in molecular barcoding by Paul De Ley, Irma Tandingan De Ley, Krystalynne Morris, et al.
  • Critical factors for assembling a high volume of DNA barcodes by Mehrdad Hajibabaei, Jeremy R. deWaard, Natalia V. Ivanova, et al.
  • A likelihood ratio test for species membership based on DNA sequence data by Mikhail V. Matz and Rasmus Nielsen
  • TaxI: a software tool for DNA barcoding using distance methods by Dirk Steinke, Miguel Vences, Walter Salzburger, et al.

瑞典科学家关心的52个科学问题

| Comments

 

为了纪念分类学之父-瑞典博物学家林奈,瑞典的研究人员专门发起了名叫Linnaeus300的网站。其中列举了目前瑞典科学家最关心的52个科学问题:

question 1: how is nanotechnology changing our lives?

Scientists are convinced that nanotechnology will enable us to monitor and control our own bodies in entirely new ways in the future. What will we be able to do ten years from now? Fifty years from now?  Read more

question 2: why do we have emotions?

Joy, grief, gnawing anxiety… We have a rich spectrum of emotions which we often see as opposites to our ability to be rational. Why has evolution provided us with these apparently irrational 'disturbances'? What's the point of feelings?  Read more

question 3: how do flowers know when it's time to bloom?

Plants lack consciousness. They cannot "know", in our sense of the word, that it's time to bloom. A Swedish researcher has found the precise gene that controls plants' flowering, thus solving a mystery that has been baffling biologists ever since the time of Carl Linnaeus. So exactly what is it that makes flowers open?  Read more

question 4: can biology explain god?

Is man an image of God or is God a human invention? Leaving aside whether you're a believer or not, it's interesting to ask why so many people believe in God. Can we learn anything from biology?  Read more

question 5: what's the smallest thing we can see?

Imagine you're out in space and scanning our solar system with your eyes. There's Eve, down on planet Earth, with an apple in her hand. Obviously you can't see her or the apple. Or can you? Nano scientists face the same astonishing size differences. The difference in size between the Earth and the apple is the same as the difference between the apple and a carbon atom in its peel!  Read more

question 6: what actually is a stem cell?

Stem cells are a medical raw material. They are as important for future medical science as forests have been for the paper industry. Without paper we wouldn't have any books. Without stem cells, we'd perhaps have to go on classifying numerous diseases as incurable.  Read more

question 7: what's so unique about humans?

Asked "what is a human being?" a biologist will answer "99% ape and 1% unknown". Only one single percent of our genetic material differentiates us from our nearest relative in the animal world, the chimpanzee. The latest research shows that this vital little one percent has to do with the brain…  Read more

question 8: how far may we go in manipulating plants?

As scientists successively reveal the genetic makeup of plants, they are also creating sharper tools for altering parts of the genetic code. What implications does this have? Advances are taking us further and further from what is 'natural'. Can we keep up?  Read more

question 9: why do children play?

Children laugh on average 400 times a day, adults 25 times. Why do we stop laughing? And why do we stop playing – most of us anyway? Is play simply a form of learning, a preparation for the future?  Read more

question 10: how do we build new molecules?

Nanotechnology is sometimes called atomic carpentry. As if it were just as easy to assemble a new molecule as it is to nail together a box with a few pieces of wood. When these pieces of wood are only millionths of a millimetre in size you realise that it can't be that easy!  Read more

question 11: who cares about the swamps?

   original link:
   <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io/blog/2009/04/09/%E7%91%9E%E5%85%B8%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E5%AE%B6%E5%85%B3%E5%BF%83%E7%9A%8452%E4%B8%AA%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E9%97%AE%E9%A2%98/'>http://Apiaceae.github.io/blog/2009/04/09/%E7%91%9E%E5%85%B8%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E5%AE%B6%E5%85%B3%E5%BF%83%E7%9A%8452%E4%B8%AA%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E9%97%AE%E9%A2%98/</a><br/>
   &nbsp;written by <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io'>Hooker</a>
   &nbsp;posted at <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io'>http://Apiaceae.github.io</a>
   </p>

科学杂志-林奈300周年的生日

| Comments

<tbody>
    <tr>
        <td id="MainColumnCell">
        <div id="MainColumn">
        <div id="LegacyContent">
        <h2>Happy 300th Birthday, Linnaeus</h2><strong>John Bohannon</strong> 
        <div class="Gonzo">
        <div class="Section">
        <div id="About">
        <img src="http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/misc/webfeat/gonzoscientist/images/bohannon_portrait.jpg" alt="John Bohannon" width="105" height="153" /> 
        <p>
        <em>A series of reports on connections between science, culture, and the arts from</em> Science <em>Contributing Correspondent John Bohannon, who, in true <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/318/5851/752b#" onclick="toggleElement('GonzoDef');return false">gonzo</a> style, will participate in the events he covers. </em>
        </p>
        <div id="GonzoDef">
        <p class="closer">
        <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/318/5851/752b#" onclick="toggleElement('GonzoDef');return false">Close window<img src="http://www.sciencemag.org/icons/closer.gy.10.gif" alt="close this" width="10" height="10" /></a> 
        </p>
        <img src="http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/misc/webfeat/gonzoscientist/images/gonzodef.gif" alt="Definition of 'gonzo'" width="237" height="253" /> 
        </div>
        <p>
        &nbsp;
        </p>
        <ul class="LinkList">
            <li style="font-size: 85%"><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/sciext/gonzoscientist/">All articles in the series</a> </li>
        </ul>
        </div>
        <p>
        <img class="Logo" src="http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/misc/webfeat/gonzoscientist/images/gonzologo_120.jpg" alt="The Gonzo Scientst" width="120" height="157" /> <span class="drop">O</span>ne thing was clear to me by the time &Aring;ke Bruce entered the room wearing a powdered wig and finery: This was by far the strangest birthday party I had ever attended. 
        </p>
        <p>
        The birthday boy, Carl Linnaeus, is long dead--he was born 300 years ago. But to mark this nicely round number, Sweden was determined to throw a party befitting one of her most famous scientific sons. He is best known as the inventor of modern taxonomy, the Latin names that divide organisms into species based on shared traits. The innovation helped pave the way for Darwinism a century later. But like a rock star who is only remembered for that one catchy song, Linnaeus&#39;s numerous other contributions are appreciated only by the groupies. 
        </p>
        <p>
        He invented field biology. Linnaeus named thousands of species himself and trained a generation of biologists who journeyed to the four corners of the world in search of the rest. (Half of them died in the process.) And that&#39;s not all. He helped local astronomer Anders Celsius design the modern thermometer. He wrote important treatises on physiology, history, and economics--and the list goes on. There seemed to be no academic realm the Swede left untouched. So it was not surprising that while I was in Sweden, there were no fewer than three Linnaeus-celebratory conferences under way. 
        </p>
        <p>
        Bruce wanted his party to stand out. As a nutrition scientist at the Swedish National Food Administration, he knew just how to do it. &quot;Linnaeus was passionate about food and diet,&quot; he says, and not just as an epicurean or a &quot;foodie.&quot; Based on the man&#39;s published works, says Bruce, food--its origins, how best to prepare and serve it, and its effects on health--lay at the intersection of all of Linnaeus&#39;s interests. 
        </p>
        <p>
        So for the past 3 years, Bruce has led a team of Swedish researchers to prepare the ultimate Linnean foodfest. Scholars from around the world were invited to explore the culture and science of food in the time of Linnaeus, as well as the progress that food science has made 300 years hence. And to get everyone in the proper frame of mind, master chefs collaborated. 
        </p>
        <p>
        The output was 3 days of food-related lectures by diverse experts--biochemists, historians, agricultural scientists, and psychologists--punctuated by recreations of 18th century meals. And to entertain us, Bruce wrote a play based on Linnaeus&#39;s journals and correspondence. The 10 roles were divvied up, with Bruce playing Linnaeus. His wife, Ingar Ribbe Bruce, not only performed in the play, but she also designed and handmade all the period costumes for the troupe. (She is a surgeon at Uppsala University Hospital when not acting or sewing.) 
        </p>
        <p>
        For the title of the event, Bruce turned to a treatise by Linnaeus in which he compares the food culture of his time with that of ancient Rome and Athens: <em>Culina Mutata</em>, the changing kitchen. 
        </p>
        <div id="Contents" style="height: 210px">
        <div id="ContentsImage">
        <img style="border: 0px" src="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/vol318/issue5851/images/small/752b-1-thumb.jpg" alt="Figure 1; all illustrations by Katrien Kolenberg" width="237" height="175" /> 
        <p class="credit">
        <strong>All illustrations by Katrien Kolenberg</strong> 
        </p>
        </div>
        <h3>What&#39;s Ahead</h3>
        <ul class="PoundDownNav">
            <li><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/318/5851/752b#section1">Better than Gruel</a> </li>
            <li><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/318/5851/752b#section2">The Crayfish Mystery</a> </li>
            <li><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/318/5851/752b#section3">The Cartesian War on Fat</a> </li>
            <li><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/318/5851/752b#section4">The Royal Banquet</a> </li>
        </ul>
        <p>
        <strong>Also see:</strong><br />
        <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/sciext/gonzoscientist/episode2/audioslides.html" target="show" onclick="window.open('/sciext/gonzoscientist/episode2/audioslides.html', 'show', config='height=610,width=810,location=0,scrollbars=1,resizable=1,toolbar=0,status=0,top=0,left=0'); return false">Audio Slideshow: Happy 300th Birthday, Linnaeus!</a> 
        </p>
        </div>
        </div>
        <a name="section1" title="section1"></a>
        <div class="Section">
        <p>
        <span class="drop">W</span>hat people ate in 18th century Europe depended on their place in the social order. The diet of a farmhand was strikingly different from that of a Swedish nobleman just down the road. So the meals, researched and designed by food scholar Gunilla Lindell, provided a kind of walking tour through late Baroque society. We worked our way up through the strata, starting from the bottom with a peasant&#39;s lunch. 
        </p>
        <p>
        And here was my first surprise. What comes to mind when you think of peasant food? For me, it&#39;s a steaming bowl of gray gruel. But I would be proud to serve this sm&ouml;rg&aring;sbord for my own birthday. To wake up the tongue, it began with salted herring and fresh onion. (The fish was prepared as in the time of Linnaeus, even saltier than what you find today--so &quot;shock&quot; the tongue is more accurate.) Balancing this blast of flavor were green peas and an addictive warm salad of pearl barley, parsley, and pork. Then came a sort of light omelet with embedded crayfish morsels, washed down with a drink made from lightly fermented juniper berries, and rounded off with a creamy dried plum tapioca. 
        </p>
        <div class="Left EdPromo">
        <h3>Additional Feature:<br />
        Audio Slideshow</h3>
        <p>
        <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/sciext/gonzoscientist/episode2/audioslides.html" target="show" onclick="window.open('http://www.sciencemag.org/sciext/gonzoscientist/episode2/audioslides.html', 'show', config='height=610,width=810,location=0,scrollbars=1,resizable=1,toolbar=0,status=0,top=0,left=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/vol318/issue5851/images/small/752b-2-thumb.jpg" alt="Figure2; Audio Slideshow" width="150" height="121" /></a> 
        </p>
        <p style="padding-bottom: 5px; border-bottom: #ccc 1px solid">
        John Bohannon narrat<p class='post-footer'>
   original link:
   <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io/blog/2009/04/08/%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97-%E6%9E%97%E5%A5%88300%E5%91%A8%E5%B9%B4%E7%9A%84%E7%94%9F%E6%97%A5/'>http://Apiaceae.github.io/blog/2009/04/08/%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97-%E6%9E%97%E5%A5%88300%E5%91%A8%E5%B9%B4%E7%9A%84%E7%94%9F%E6%97%A5/</a><br/>
   &nbsp;written by <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io'>Hooker</a>
   &nbsp;posted at <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io'>http://Apiaceae.github.io</a>
   </p>

分类学准备好加入PLoS系统学吗?

| Comments

Taxonomy has historically been relegated to the back alleys of the publishing world. In-house museum journals, obscure regional or specialty publications and even more obscure foreign language academy reports have hidden many species descriptions, revisions and monographs from the eyes of interested biologists. Not to say this is the only reason for current crisis in taxonomy (see Rodman & Cody 2003), but it certainly contributes. The hard work and insurmountable dedication of the taxonomist to furthering their group of interest should be rewarded and not locked away for the other 5 people in the world working on that genus of organism. Ecologists rely on species descriptions to compare the fauna they find in their studies with the published literature. The imperative nature of correct identifications of species cannot be understated in the medical, infectious disease, and parasitology literature. Without a doubt, quality taxonomic research is invaluable, in high demand and highly underappreciated by funding agencies and other scientists, even those who rely on such work (PEET not withstanding)

The lack of visibility of taxonomic research and the failure to make systematics as a whole relevant to the everyday lives of people has been a burden on the community. Much of the work is tedious yet vital to biodiversity studies, medicine and biotechnology. IrregardlessIrrespective of how one chooses to define a species, the species debate, the issue of perception is pervasive in this field. Many taxonomists are made to feel inferior to their colleagues doing experimental work who bring in much larger grants. The truth of the matter is that taxonomy is not a profitable venture for academic institutions why rely in part on the money they skim off of grants. It is a traditionally an inexpensive field, even with the use of molecular tools to aid in phylogenetic reconstructions. You can easily get by with a microscope, computer and digital camera. DNA extractions are relatively inexpensive and you can send the DNA product off to get analyzed elsewhere affordably, not needing to purchase expensive sequencing equipment.

Taxonomists need to improve the visibility and relevance of the field to ensure a continued, or at the least renewed, interest for the study of species, either from a theoretical, philosophical or practical framework. One way to contribute to increasing the visibility of taxonomic research is to publish in Open Access (OA). Several studies have shown there to be a citation advantage in OA papers (Eysenbach 2006). Zootaxa has taken the initiative in the taxonomy world by offering to publish any peer-reviewed taxonomic work free of charge for subscriber access and $20/page for OA. Other taxonomic "niche" journals exist with various financial differences, but have yet to attain the reputation of Zootaxa to my knowledge. But it is my own feeling that Zootaxa is only known well among other taxonomists, with the majority of other beneficiaries either unable to obtain articles because the bulk of the articles are locked behind the subscriber wall. This also has the effect of making less text available for search engines, such as Google Scholar.


The Public Library of Science (PLoS) may help to alleviate part of the problems of visibility. They have grown to represent the standard in OA publishing and have a successful business model. Their success among scientists can measured by the fact that between all their publications they are PLoS ONE alone is publishing on average 50 high quality papers per week. This is higher than journal, even the weekly big names. It is clear that their model is successful and scientists are actively seeking them out to publish their research. This is a clear argument in favor of wide dissemination (Chapter 3, Recommendation 8A of the Code):
"Authors have a responsibility to ensure that new scientific names, nomenclatural acts, and information likely to affect nomenclature are made widely known. This responsibility is most easily discharged by publication in appropriate scientific journals or well-known monographic series and by ensuring that new names proposed by them are entered into the Zoological Record."

PLoS can make nomenclatural acts widely disseminated by providing them free of charge and out in open for all interested individuals with computer access. The steadily increasing popularity of PLoS ensures taxonomic work reaches a wide audience with a broad range of backgrounds. For instance, if you are working on parasites in humans and are describing a new species of muscle tissue boring pathogenic nematode you can tag the article as "medicine", "Nematoda", "New species", "Systematics", "Pathogen", etc. to reach audiences in non-parasitology fields.

Why would a taxonomist want to reach non-taxonomic areas of science? Citations are low in taxonomy. Species descriptions are read, the names are used in many publications, hopefully with author and year, but somehow the paper describing said species remains out of the list of references. This means indexing services like PubMed and Web of Science miss the uncited species descriptions in the tangled web of cross-reference. For example, Drosophila melanogaster Meigen, 1830, should be the most cited paper in recorded history due to the amount of work on this model organism. So what of biodiversity studies with hundreds of species? This does pose a problem. Nowadays, there is supplementary online material and the citations could be referred there so long as they are properly indexed and the gods who fiddle around with such productivity metrics recognize these citations.

Another argument to get your work widely read is that universities aren't appearing to hire people to do basic taxonomy anymore. They need another hook, perhaps molecular evolution or ecology. Even museums are tending to hire individuals with outside specialties. I'm not sure where the future of taxonomy may lie, but larger questions need to be addressed than just what is out there. Taxonomic research helps in many areas of biological science. The more people that know of your work, the more opportunities may be to collaborate on new projects with different directions, making you a more viable applicant. Besides who wants to invest so much into something only to see it hidden away forever?

Are there any barriers to publishing a species description with PLoS? Yes, Chapter 3 of the Code, Article 8.6 states:

<span class="title">&quot;<span style="font-weight: bold">Works produced after 1999 by a method that does not employ printing on paper</span>.</span> For a work produced after 1999 by a method other than printi<p class='post-footer'>
   original link:
   <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io/blog/2009/04/08/%E5%88%86%E7%B1%BB%E5%AD%A6%E5%87%86%E5%A4%87%E5%A5%BD%E5%8A%A0%E5%85%A5PLoS%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F%E5%AD%A6%E5%90%97%EF%BC%9F/'>http://Apiaceae.github.io/blog/2009/04/08/%E5%88%86%E7%B1%BB%E5%AD%A6%E5%87%86%E5%A4%87%E5%A5%BD%E5%8A%A0%E5%85%A5PLoS%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F%E5%AD%A6%E5%90%97%EF%BC%9F/</a><br/>
   &nbsp;written by <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io'>Hooker</a>
   &nbsp;posted at <a href='http://Apiaceae.github.io'>http://Apiaceae.github.io</a>
   </p>

日本的I Found It!项目

| Comments

The Biodiversity Center of Japan's Ministry of the Environment launched a citizen participation-based project called "IKIMONO-MIKKE - Biodiversity Observation by One Million People" from July,2008, and released a preliminary report concerning the summer 2008 on October 16, 2008. The program consists of two surveys: "IKIMONO-SHIRABE (I found it!)," in which citizens report the dates they identified three target species or natural phenomena selected for each season, and "Feel Warmer?," a survey to ask participants about the effects of global warming in their local area. As of October 14, 2008, the surveys had collected 8,233 and 1,966 reports, respectively.

"IKIMONO-SHIRABE" in the summer 2008 targeted three cicadas typically identified in the summer in Japan, Oncotympana maculaticollis, Meimuna opalifera, and Cryptotympana facialis, and participants recorded their first and last dates of chirping and associated changes. The results were compared with those of "Environmental Indicator Species," a survey conducted by the Center in 1995. Cryptotympana facialis, whose emergence is known to be more temperature-dependent than other two cicadas, tended to begin chirping at an earlier date in three prefectures where many reports were made. However, as the date of first chirping was delayed in some other prefectures, further detailed analysis will be made using data from smaller segments such as cities and towns.

The "Feel Warmer?" survey indicated that 93 percent of respondents recognized signs of global warming. Many noticed the changes in the bloom date of cherry blossoms and/or Japanese silver grass, both of which are closely associated with Japanese seasonal events including school entrance ceremonies and moon-viewing. The "IKIMONO-MIKKE" program is planned to be held each season.

原文链接:http://www.japanfs.org/en/pages/028673.html

 

BioNET-全球分类学网络

| Comments

BioNET is an international not-for-profit initiative dedicated to promoting taxonomy, especially in the biodiversity rich but economically poorer countries of the world. Working via local partnerships (LOOPs), BioNET strives to provide a forum for collaboration that is equally open to all taxonomists and to the other users of taxonomy. Working with partners locally and internationally, our work contributes to raising awareness of the importance of taxonomy to society, building and sharing of capacity, and meeting taxonomic needs via innovative tools and approaches.  


Our affiliated partnerships are uniquely positioned to identify and help meet local taxonomic needs relating to sustainable development and conservation, in particular needs relating to the Millennium Development Goals and the 2010 target to significantly reduce the rate of loss of biodiversity.

 

主页网址:http://www.bionet-intl.org/opencms/opencms/whoWeAre

 

Copyright © 2013 - Hooker - Powered by Octopress